Aspect of corporate misgivings
It is therefore true that the elements that underpin the effectiveness of the UAE have a strong element of duality. This is because, these elements relate to both internal and external factors that have the potency to affect the rate and the extent of the UAE profitability, sustainability, growth and expansion. For instance, it is clear that the internal factors that may beset the operations of thew UAE are the very policies themselves and the UAE organisational hierarchy and leadership structure.
On the other hand, it is also true that the operations, the strategies, expansion and profitability of the UAE are all matters that are susceptible to external factors of the UAE. Some of these external factors that may derail the realisation of the interests of the UAE are the aforementioned negative public perception and suspicion that tend to highly associate the UAE as any other organisation that falls under the jurisdiction of the Islamic or Arabic ownership and / territory.
This matter is so serious to an extent that it has been ranked as one of the chief factor that has always facilitated the scaring away of potential investors in the UAE shares. This external turmoil can be seen to be the epitome of the fact that the UAE could be suffering from the failure to realise internal cohesion.
Given the fact that there are no reparations that were made by the UAE member states to Abu Dhabi, it becomes a matter highly subject to debate whether the UAE has been totally extricated from internal and insidious acrimony that stems from the damages that Abu Dhabi as the underdog, underwent, at the hands of the rest of the six UAE member states. The relevance of the above sentiment is venerated by the fact that that the UAE has always been seen to have suffered spates of backlash from a nation that at one time, felt shortchanged.
This was particularly made a reality when Abu Dhabi, even after being incorporated into the UAE council and thus making it the seventh of the UAE member state, staged boycotts on some of the policies that were being set aside for ratification or implementation by the UAE. At other times, even in the face of having full backing from the Abu Dhabi commission, the UAE has still suffered resistance from the citizens of Abu Dhabi themselves. In most cases, this is made manifest by these citizens taking to the streets after a policy has been ratified or executed as a show of resistance against the UAE goals.
This however is seen to normally take place when the citizens are not at home with the policy that is in the verge of being implemented, rather than because of the acrimony that may have come about, following the past weak relations that UAE may have had with Abu Dhabi as a nation. It should not be seen to be fortuitous, the fact that the losses UAE has been making, 31% of the same have been accredited to the failure by the same body to realise internal cohesion. RECOMMENDATIONS. It can be said that it is prudent for the UAE to consider making changes so as to reverse the above adverse condition.
At the same time, it is expedient that this be done so that the UAE export trade can be brought to its zenith. This means that the UAE has to redefine some of her standpoints on matters that are so pivotal, matters that deal with leadership, reparations and abrogation of policies, among others. In the first place, it is incumbent upon the UAE as an organ and the entire UAE member states to come together so as to draw anew, the leadership pattern that is to be followed. This is highly expedient, should the UAE be considering the prospects of making profitability, sustenance, expansion and growth a must and a reality.
This is because, the UAE can still be seen to be clinging on to the hereditary form of accessing leadership positions, even after it has become apparent that the practice has become faced out and radically replaced by and with the observation of democracy as an ideal form of leadership. While it is not clear the reason behind UAE’s instance on this form of leadership, it is however obvious and apparent that the confederation in question has really experienced leadership hitches and hiccups.