India steadfastly stood for not accepting charity. Not only that, India deployed its defense personnel, medical teams, disaster experts, ships, helicopters and other type of human, material, and equipment sources to help Sir Lankan, Mauritius, and Indonesia. It may be noted that India itself suffered from the tsunami and was at the same time internally responding to the aftermath of the tsunami. India is lower income group country, while Indonesia is middle-income group country.
During a field research visit to Sir Lankan in June 2005, this author and various colleagues traveled over a bridge rebuilt by Indian army that was destroyed by the tsunami. Whomsoever we talked in Sir Lankan, were very appreciative of the help provided by India (Guppy 2005). In comparison in the aftermath of Strain, with offers from the four corners of the lobe pouring in, Secretary of State Condolences Rice has decided “no offer that can help alleviate the suffering of the people in the afflicted area will be refused,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormick said (Express India 2005).
More than 150 countries and foreign organizations, including some improvised, poor small countries, and even the countries which did not had friendly ties with USA pledged $ 454 million
Need essay sample on "Disaster management"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page
But to receive $ 126 million from 40 donor countries of the world was not appropriate. For the economy of USA, $ 126 million is insignificant. This is if we consider only the financial aspects of accepting donations, however, if we consider the political.