logo image

Egregious Business Behavior Essay

Should hose whistle-blowers each have made more effort to be heard? How? In each of the case, there are whistle-blowers. For example, Carl Bass was a whistle-blower to Arthur Andersen. After ignoring by the partner David Duncan, he took no deep action to prevent the wrong-doing. The whistle-blowers advices or warnings are always Ignored, even though the whistle- blowers knew the problems and tried to prevent them. Actually, they could have made more effort to be heard.

For example, they could go the Board of Director, go out to the higher organization, go to the public, or even go to the media. All those might prevent the lost. Case: World (Pages 112 – 1 18) 1 . Describe the mechanisms that World’s management used to transfer profit from other time periods to Inflate the current period. World’s management transferred approximately $771 million from certain line expense accounts to a UP&E capital expenditure account. 2. Why did Arthur Andersen go along with each of these mechanisms?

There were driven by revenue They wanted to maintain World as a client There were arrogant by thinking they would be caught and punished conflict of interest, they felt more responsible to the client rather than the

Need essay sample on "Egregious Business Behavior"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

upholding their fiduciary responsibilities Not adhering to their internal controls 3. How should World’s board of directors have prevented the manipulations that management used? They need to Improve their Internal controls. 4. Bernie Beers was not an accountant, so he needed the cooperation of accountants to make his manipulations work. Why did World’s accountants go along?

Because they only want to get paid, not thinking about the results. They will do whatever the senior management wants them to do no matter if it is wrong. Working with Arthur Andersen shows that he didn’t make ethical decisions In the business, so the other accountants did not either. $408 million? Because they felt the money was used for buying shares back into the company. 6. How can a board ensure that whistle-blowers will come forward to tell them about questionable activities? The board can inform the whistle-blowers that coming forward will not hurt their employment or allow them to be victimized.

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
Complete Buyer Protection
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy