logo image

Finance for Managers Essay

In the evaluation of a firms profitability, future growth prospects and performance, finance managers have to be very certain about the parameters and assumptions they choose for the process. While the methods of financial management may be similar globally, it is the responsibility of the manager to make sure that the assessment be as accurate as possible so that no unaccounted risks or problems occur after the decision making process. With the recent financial crisis, the whole financial services industry has come under heavy scrutiny and critique.

It is baffling when one thinks how such large and time-proven institutional investors could invest in sub-prime mortgage financing without considering the actual default risk probability. Managers have to be extremely careful when analyzing and forecasting returns of investment options as a the consequences of a wrong decision can be felt not only by the investors, but can affect other businesses as well as society, just like the recessionary phase the world is witnessing at this moment. Nevertheless, financial management is essential for all businesses, and there is dependency on proper financial management for growth and profitability.

Taking the case in sight, this paper will try to demonstrate how investment options are evaluated and what

Need essay sample on "Finance for Managers"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

aspects are taken into assessment. A. Should Caledona focus on cash flows or accounting profits in making its capital-budgeting decisions? Should the company be interested in incremental cash flows, incremental profits, total cash flows or total profits? B. How does depreciation affect cash flows? C. How do sunk costs affect determination of cash flows? When evaluating investment options, managers and investors are interested in looking at the Economic Value that arises of the proposal.

For this reason, the focus of capital-budgeting decisions is on cash flows and not accounting profits (Khan, Khan & Jain, 2007). The most basic reason of choosing cash flows over profit figures is due to non-cash expenditures which are included in the calculation of profit. For instance, capital intensive firms, such as in the manufacturing industry, have high depreciation expense charges in their profit & loss account, and while this reduces the profit figure it is mostly for purposes of legal tax-reduction and does not have a direct effect on cash flow.

When assessing the return of an investment, the actual generation of cash is taken into account, as it is what matters to the firm, being the investor, over accounting profits. Using cash flow for analysis also erases some accounting ambiguity associated with accounting profit. These ambiguities arise due to differences of methods applied in areas such as depreciation expense calculation and inventory valuation amongst others. This gives rise to differences in the calculation of net income based on different measures.

Also, an important element of investment appropriateness is the Time-Value of Money. When taking cash flows to calculate return, it is based on actual cash received and spent by a firm rather than just accounting entries, such as revenue and expenditure recorded under accounts received and payable which may be paid at a much later date (Drake, Fabozzi, Peterson, 2002). Firms also choose to focus on incremental cash flows as they provide details of additional cash flow generated by the investment, and not just total cash flows.

Incremental cash flows are better suited to measuring the returns of the investment based on the above information. Depreciation has to be added back into the EBIT figure for calculation of free cash flow, since it is a non-cash expense. The effect of depreciation on cash flows is an indirect one, as it affects the taxes paid by the firm. Taxes are calculated on the accounting profit figure, which is reduced by depreciation for a smaller tax figure. Therefore the effect of depreciation is actually a reduced tax expense.

Sunk costs are incurred cost with regard to a proposal, regardless of whether investment is made in the said project or not. Therefore, sunk costs are not incremental costs and are not considered when an investment is made. For instance, if a textile firm undergoing expansion wants to use a weaving loom purchased at an earlier date, the cost of that loom will not be taken into account as it is not an incremental cash flow, and is a sunk cost because it has been paid for regardless of its use in the new project (Cabral, 1995).

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
×
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
|
Complete Buyer Protection
|
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy