logo image

Inflation and economic growth Essay

1 . Can gross domestic product be used as a measure of welfare, well being? Discuss. Gross domestic product (GAP) is a vital concept in national income accounting. It may be defined as “the total market value of all final goods and services produced within a given period by the factors of production located within a country’ (Case, Fair & Ester, 2008, p. 105. ). Essentially, GAP is a measure of production of an economy; that is, it measures its economic performance. Despite this, economists often use GAP statistics as an indication of social welfare. According to Case, Fair and Ester (2008) forever, this may cause serious problems to arise.

These problems are put forwards in the following limitations. Firstly, GAP tends to misrepresent or exaggerate social welfare in periods of natural disasters. During hurricane Gilbert in 1988 for example, Jamaica was massively destroyed by heavy rainfall and destructive winds. Lives and valuable possessions were lost and homes and businesses were left with millions of dollars worth of damages. Subsequently, consumer, business and government expenditure increased in order to effect repairs, replace possessions and relieve the suffering. This extensive expenditure caused Jamaican GAP to increase.

However, Jamaican did not enjoy a higher

Need essay sample on "Inflation and economic growth"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

standard of living. On the contrary, they were made worse off. This illustrates that GAP is not an accurate measure of the welfare of an economy. Secondly, GAP does not reflect transactions that take place in the underground economy . These transactions, however, involve actual output and generate income that may have a tremendous effect on the society welfare. According to Adair (2013), the underground economy is not only important in developing countries but also in many developed ones, particularly in Southern Europe.

These economies provide employment for the relatively unskilled as well as resources for the formal economy and pump large amounts of income into the circular flow. This acquisition of employment, resources and income makes firms and households better off in many respects. However, since such transactions are not documented by GAP, it is not a true measure of social well-being. Another limitation of GAP as a measure of welfare is that it excludes non-market activities which may make people better or worse off in important ways. Such activities include volunteer and household work.

Volunteer work done at hospitals, schools, community centers, children homes and other organizations greatly benefit society and contributes to the improvement of one’s general standard of living (Adair, 2013). Similarly, household work and the production of goods and services (such as cooking and childcare) within the home involve actual output and benefit those who live there (Case, Fair &Oster, 2008). However, because such work is not for the market, it is not captured by GAP and therefore does not show these welfare gains. Because GAP is computed at market prices, it ignores production externalities (Adair, 2013).

Such externalities include noise, pollution and traffic congestion which may have tremendous effects on people’s (and the environment’s) well-being. However, according to Case, Fair and Ester (2008), GAP accounting rules do not adjust for production that confers externalities, regardless of how much of these externalities are ‘split over’ during production. This can be applied to the issue of using fossil fuels for energy. Even inflation and economic growth By dwellers boosting a country’s GAP, it may mean more pollution and adverse and harmful effects to our environment (Adair, 2013).

Gaps exclusion of these negative effects makes it an inappropriate and inaccurate measure of welfare. Wealth distribution; an important attributing factor to welfare and standards of living, is not expressed by GAP (Case, Fair & Ester, 2008) and therefore cannot be used as a welfare measure. In other words, GAP does not describe whether or not the people of an economy are truly benefiting from economic growth. This can be seen in countries such as Qatar that has significant wealth due to oil trade but where only an insignificant percentage of the population hold all the wealth of the country (Adair, 2013).

Due to the manners in which GAP is calculated it does not show whether or not growth is actually improving the welfare of the general population. Leisure time is of utmost importance to the well-being of all individuals. An increase in leisure time means an increase in social welfare. This, however, is not reflected in GAP. In fact, according to Case, Fair and Ester (2008), some increases in leisure time (such as in a period of full employment) leads to a decrease in GAP even though social welfare have increased. It is therefore obviously, the GAP cannot be used as a measure of welfare and well-being. 2.

What are some of the problems with the interpretation of unemployment statistics that can cause unemployment statistics to underestimate or overestimate the true rate of unemployment? Unemployment is a macroeconomic concept which refers to the situation in which people are without work and are making active efforts to gain employment (Investigated, 2014). According to Case, Fair and Ester (2008), unemployment statistics is a key indicator of an economy’s performance. As such, the Statistical Institute of Jamaica (STATING) conducts Labor Force Surveys and publishes various measure of unemployment on a quarterly basis.

One such measure is the employment rate. The unemployment rate, as defined by Investigated (2014), is a measure of the prevalence of unemployment and is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force. Like other unemployment data, the unemployment rate has various limitations. These may cause either an underestimation or an overestimation of the true rate of unemployment and are presented below. Firstly, the unemployment rate does not account for underemployment.

The Merriam Webster Dictionary (2014) defines underemployment as the condition in which people in a labor force are employed at less than full-time or regular Jobs or at Jobs inadequate with respect to their training or economic needs. In Jamaica for example, there are formally trained and highly skilled nurses who are working at fast food Joints because they find it difficult to get Jobs within the health sector. Similarly, there are persons with master’s degrees in education who are working as part-time or substitute teachers.

Despite the fact that these persons represent unused labor efforts, they are counted as employed and are therefore not accounted for in the country’s unemployment rate. As such, the unemployment rate underestimates the actual amount of unemployment in the economy. Another limitation of the unemployment rate which the exclusion of discouraged workers. Discouraged workers refer to people who are without a Job and who have stopped looking for employment (Buck, 2008). Such workers may have stopped looking because of a lack of skills, previous unsuccessful searches or a lack of available Jobs in the field.

Because they are no longer looking for jobs, discouraged workers are classified as “not in the labor force” and no longer counted as unemployed (Case, Fair & Ester, 2008). Therefore, an increase in the number of discouraged workers reduces the unemployment rate. During the recession of 1972 to 1980, for example, Jamaican unemployment rate reduced by approximately 0. 23 between 1976 and 1977. According to Chunk (2012), this was due to the fact that thousands of workers became discouraged and stopped looking for work, thus falling out of the ranks of the unemployed and the labor force.

If these workers had continued their search for Jobs, the unemployment rates for these three years would have increased. Consequently, workers becoming discouraged may educe the reported unemployment rate and underestimate the true amount of unemployment in the economy. The unemployment rate may also be understated if persons who have been unemployed for prolonged periods are not included in the calculations (Buck, 2008). In carrying out its Labor Force Surveys, STATING excludes persons who have been unemployed for over 12 months from the unemployment figures.

This will cause the true rate of unemployment to appear lower than it really is. Other limitations of the unemployment rate will cause an overestimation of the real amount of unemployment in an economy. One such limitation has to do with the serialization of facts with the aim of receiving unemployment benefits. In many developed countries such as the United States of America and England, the government provides monetary compensation for unemployed citizens. According to Buck (2008), this provides an incentive for persons to provide misleading information to surveyors.

With the increase in reported unemployment, the unemployment rate of such countries will be overestimated. Even though the Jamaican government does not provide a benefit that is specifically for the unemployed, citizens may misrepresent themselves to STATING officials with the hope that some benefit is achieve. Many people have been found to respond untruthfully to questions about employment, welfare and standard of living because they believe that they will get sum benefit. This contributes to the overestimation of Jamaican unemployment rate. 3.

How might an economy experience an increase in nominal GAP but experience negative growth at the same time? According to the Library of Economics and Liberty (2010), economic values (such as gross domestic product [GAP]) may be expressed in one of two ways; as a nominal value or as a real value. Simply put, a nominal value is an economic value that is measured at current market prices. In other words, it is an unadjusted value which reflects current situations. Consequently, nominal GAP is GAP measured in current dollars; that is, all components of GAP measured at their current prices (Case, Fair & Ester, 2008).

Since nominal GAP is a measure of output at current prices, if the general price levels in an economy increase (due to inflation) then the figure for nominal GAP will also increase. This increase in nominal GAP may cause one to believe that there has been actual growth in the economy. However, this is not so if the quantity of output itself did not change since actual economic growth example of a simplified economy that produces only one good: pencils. In each year (2012 and 2013), twenty (20) pencils were produced. If the price of a pencil was $3 in 2012, then the nominal GAP for that year would have been $60 (I. . $20*$3). If, however, the price of a pencil rose by $2 in 2013 due to inflation, then the nominal GAP would be $100 (I. E. $20*$5). Evidently, nominal GAP increased by $40 even though the quantity produced remained the same. In summation, inflation may cause an economy to experience an increase in nominal GAP but at the same time experience negative growth. A measure of real GAP makes adjustments for inflation and is therefore a more accurate measure of actual economic growth. 4. Inflation exerts significant costs on the economy. Specifically, explain how inflation: I. Causes a misapplication of resources I’. Discourages savings iii. Redistributes wealth from lenders to borrowers. Inflation, in economics, refers to the sustained increase in the general price levels of goods and services in an economy over a given period of time (Investigated, 2014). Price stability is one of the four main objectives of macroeconomic policy and this is cause of the adverse economic effects associated with increasing price levels (inflation). These include the misapplication of resources, the discouragement of savings and the redistribution of wealth from lenders to borrowers.

When inflation occurs, the prices of commodities rise at different rates. Firms, unions, banks and other economic institution will influence costs, rents, wages and interest rates to different extents and this causes price distortions. According to Begs (2013), these distortions negatively affect the efficiency of the price mechanism in the allocation of resources towards different goods and services. When inflation is volatile, firms and households are unlikely to have sufficient information on relative price levels in order to make informed decisions about which products to supply and purchase.

As a result, resources may be miscalculated. Firms may ignorantly inject capital and allocate extra labor to goods that are more costly and relatively unprofitable. Similarly, households, not having sufficient information on price relations, may allocate their financial resources to more expensive goods. The distortions caused by inflation may cause resources to be miscalculated in different ways. Suppose, for example, manufacturing workers get fast wage increases while public sector employees do not.

This will cause resources (labor) to be reallocated (ultimately miscalculated) due to the relative market power of the different workers and various socio-economic and political issues may arise. According to Rennin (2014), inflation is seen as highly undesirable for the simple reason that it reduces the purchasing power of money. As a result, inflationary periods tend to encourage quick spending and discourage saving. As the general price levels in an economy increase, sisters Paramus, the value of money will fall. This means that people will not be able to buy as many goods and services as before.

Because of this, they will not want to save. Instead, they will spend their incomes as quickly as possible (before its value falls any further) in order to acquire goods and services at current prices; that is, before they become more expensive and less affordable (Economic Revision, 2014). This problem experienced in Bolivia in 1984 and 1985. During this period, the price of an egg rose from 3,000 pesos to $10,000 pesos in one week. In 1985, three bottles of aspirin were sold for the same price a luxury car had been sold for in 1982 (Case, Fair & Ester, 008).

Evidently, money held in savings accounts would not be able to acquire the same amount of goods and services as before since the real value of such savings would have been eroded. A man saving to buy a luxury car would only be able to buy a mere three bottles of aspirin. Of course, this effect occurs when the rates of interests paid on savings are below the actual rate of inflation. According to Rennin (2014), if interest rates are higher than the inflation rate, then savers would still be able to acquire the goods and services they desire and be left with real returns. Inflation also redistributes wealth from lenders to borrowers.

As Begs (2013) proposed, when the price levels in an economy rise, the value of debt repayments diminish. This benefit borrowers at the expense of lenders since the repayments will be made with less valuable dollars. For example, suppose I borrow $10 to buy a pencil with the intent to pay back next week. However, at the point of my repayment, the price of pencils increased by 50% now costing $15. The $10 dollars that I repaid would have been less valuable in real terms since it would not be able to a buy a pencil. Obviously, I would have benefited at the lender’s expense.

In order to get real turns on loans, lending agencies charge interest rates which often take into account the rate of anticipated inflation; the higher the expected rate of inflation, the higher the interest charged. However, the problem of redistribution remains if the rate of inflation is higher than the interest charged. According to Begs (2013), this causes the value of debt to be lower in real terms and therefore reduces the real returns on loans. Again, this makes borrowers better off at the expense of lenders. Consider the example proposed by Case, Fair and Ester (2008). Suppose you borrow $100 from me to be paid back in a year.

We both anticipate that the inflation rate during the year would be 10% and therefore agree on an interest rate of 15%; 10% to account for inflation and a 5% real interest rate for me (l would receive $1 15). Suppose however, the actual rate of inflation during the year turned out to be 20%, I as the lender will be hurt. Because inflation was higher than expected, you have paid back less than you have borrowed in real terms and I received a negative real interest rate of 5%3. Evidently, inflation, especially when it is higher than expected, redistributes wealth from lenders to borrowers. 5. Consider the following basket ITEMS

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
×
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
|
Complete Buyer Protection
|
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy