logo image

Just-War theory and killing pf non-combats Essay

Regardless of the presence of civilians, the U. S. bombing of the Amiriya shelter cannot be considered morally just under the just war theory.  Politicians can argue the veracity of claims of weapons of mass destruction and the potential threat of Saddam Hussein’s regime against hundreds of thousands of Kurds, women and anyone else who got in the madman’s way. They can argue whether the Congressional authorization to use any means necessary was a declaration of war by the Congress and therefore created a just war, but ultimately the American-Iraqi Conflict does not qualify as a just war because any educated scholar can agree that the probability of success was never high.

The region has been in turmoil for most of human history and there are three distinct political and ideological groups involved in a struggle which all agree will not end until the other sides are wiped out.  On that point alone, the Iraq war can never qualify as just. Arguments whether the president had just cause and good intentions will have to be left to moral analysis of God and those who come later and have access to perfect hindsight, but with the known political turmoil in the Middle

Need essay sample on "Just-War theory and killing pf non-combats"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

East, there is no way that this could qualify as a morally just war. Since the war itself is immoral, actions taken in furtherance of the war are predisposed to be immoral. While great acts of morality or heroism could lead to a moral action in an immoral war, this was neither.

Likewise, using the Doctrine of Double Effect, the bombing of the Amiriya shelter cannot be justified. In fact, the bombing does not even qualify for analysis using the DDE. To be eligible for justification via the DDE, the initial action must be morally ambiguous or must have good moral intentions. The bombing of the shelter had neither. The intended consequence of bombing the shelter was the death of Saddam Hussein. Regardless of the war declaration, regardless of Hussein’s atrocities, there is no moral ambiguity here. The Bible never says though shall not kill unless he’s a really bad man. The moral intent from the beginning was a bad one and it cannot be made good by analysis of the subsequent events surrounding the action. By the principals of the DDE, the bombing of the Amiriya shelter was morally wrong.

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
×
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
|
Complete Buyer Protection
|
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy