Methodological pluralism within Economics
David Richard was a pivotal economist whose work impacted the transition from classical political economics to neo classical economics. In the sass and ass governments began to measure things in the economy, collecting systematic economic statistics and growth data according to Orchard’s approach. This is when we began to see change in economic techniques. Previously economics had no study of its own, but once the new empirical economical approach came to be then mathematicians, engineers and scientists started moving towards economic thought.
This is when scientist happened. The way scientists go about thing is universally accepted with virtually no criticism of the methods. This is how the ideas from math’s and physics were imported to economics through models. However methods were applied inappropriately. The economy was now being thought of as a machine. The laws of thermodynamics within physics were applied to economic processes. Such processes are known as the utility function and equilibrium.
Neoclassical economics was using the same mathematical formulation as classical mechanics and was therefore fundamentally flawed because: utility cannot really be observed or measured as every individual has their own and it is unstable; an equilibrium theory Anton be used to study irreversible processes. The general economic equilibrium
Need essay sample on "Methodological pluralism within Economics"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page
This is why Blend argued that we adopted the wrong science, we should have adopted biological thinking rather that mechanical thinking. He asked the question, Why is economics not an evolutionary science? (Blend 1898). Blend said When a modern scientist asks the question why? He insists on answer in terms of cause and effect’ (Blend 1898,p 377). Methodological pluralism within Economics By sounds-Squid