logo image

Pharmaceutical company Essay

Imagine a situation whereby one is a product manager with a Pharmaceutical company that most consumers like buying from. But fortunately or unfortunately, the government issues a statement implicating that use of E-pills is illegal and so all pharmacies should cease from selling such products. This is certainly a blow to all pharmaceutical companies and a recipe for big losses. Following this directive the management instructs the product manager to make sure that all E-pills in stock do not go to waste.

The situation becomes very complicated leaving the product manager with hard decisions to make; it is a do or die conflict, isn’t it? If one heeds to the company’s position then one will act illegally and the next thing is to get behind bars. If one heeds to the government’s directive then the next thing is to lose the job. It is either one heeds to the company’s position or government’s directive. Therefore, it is either one gets behind bars or loses the job. It becomes more complicated if one brings in his personal ethical values.

This study is based on a real life experience where a product manager decides to stand by his own ethical convictions. In order to

Need essay sample on "Pharmaceutical company"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

give a theoretical framework for this study several ethical theories will also be considered. In the long run, the study will give a critical synthesis of the personal experience and the said ethical theories. This study wishes to state that professional responsibility is not marked by how much one brings profits to the organization, but it is marked by how much one defends what is morally upright.

Situation Analysis Before delving into narrating the personal experience, it is worthwhile to understand the position of the company in this matter and the position of the government as well. Just to remind the reader, this is an experience by a product manager who is pressured by the company to authorize manufacture of E-pills despite the recent government’s directive that banned their use. The company believes that it cannot comply with the new law for the following reasons: (a) Most people like the product and they use it.

(b) The product is medically proven and the users have not reported any side effects to it. (c) The product is used internationally. (d) The demand for the product is very high. (e) The company will experience big losses ever if it goes that direction. (f) The government recent position is null and void since it had approved the product before through an act of parliament. Why then does it have to revoke it? (g) The essence of this matter is of a moral nature. The company believes that consumers should have freedom of choice. The government justifies its position on the following grounds:

• The product is harmful to the health of the users, that is, it has many side effects. • The government believes that life begins at conception. • The continued use of E-pills is making most youths engage in promiscuous behavior. • Pharmaceutical companies have failed to exercise responsibility in the product. There are so many illegal businesses going on with the product, for instance, second-hand selling through unregistered pharmacies. Personal Experience I work in a Pharmaceutical company and it is now five years down the line.

I work as a product manager and am supposed to coordinate all the manufacturing processes. I am responsible for the quality assurance department. In case the government issues a change of policy on pharmaceutical products it is incumbent upon me to implement such policies. For quite some time now, I have not experienced serious conflicts with the board of directors; I believe my services have been recommendable. But, in this year I have had one of my biggest crises in this position. For the first time my company decided to overlook a government’s change of policy.

Unfortunately, I was left to shoulder the burden since I had to make decisions that would contradict the new policy. Yes, our company has got so many clients and we supply pharmaceutical products all over the country and even export to other countries. The company records huge revenues; in fact, we grow our income by 30% every financial year. So, I empathized with the company when it contemplated on the losses it would incur if it ceases manufacturing E-pills. It is among our company’s core products. So, this policy really is a threat to the company.

It attacks its core business and this is a big problem. Here I am, and am supposed to ensure that the company continues to manufacture E-pills, and besides, the existing E-pills already in stock cannot go to waste. In very simple words, they had to be sold, period! I tried to convince the management to take heed of the new law to avoid legal hustles that would make the company incur more unprecedented costs. I even did an inventory valuation for them to show that the loss of E-pills already in stock would only affect fifteen percent of the company’s revenue.

In my opinion, the loss was recoverable if we produced other pharmaceutical products I had in mind. This was not agreeable to the management and they stood by their convictions which I did mention above. I had little options available and now it was either I lose the job or I get behind bars. I decided to contemplate on the situation and make a better judgment based on my personal values and my career convictions. It is worth to mention that am more inclined to deontology ethical viewpoint. I prefer doing good as an end in itself. I do not believe that the end qualifies the means no matter the circumstances.

I believe that laws should be obeyed especially if they aim to safeguard the public’s common good. In the light of my personal ethical values I decided the following: 1) Not to supervise any processes to do with E-pills. 2) Requested for a job degrade so as to let someone else do the job. 3) Seek protection from the trade union in writing in case of retrenchment. This upheaval did not only affect my company, it had a national impact and I can bet that the government was very serious on the issue. If any one was caught selling the product it attracted a huge fine and imprisonment.

To say the least, selling of E-pills became an illegal business. It made no difference between selling cocaine or marijuana and selling E-pills, both would lead to the same consequences anyway. Currently, all pharmaceutical companies have accused the government for what they call “infringement to freedom of choice”. There is an appeal already in the court of law and a ruling will be made soon. We are very optimistic because the witnesses to the case are thorough going medical practitioners and scientists. They are there to defend the use of E-pills since they believe that the government’s position is null and void.

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
Complete Buyer Protection
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy