logo image

Social Responsibility of Business

The most basic definition of a monopoly is a firm which exists alone in the entire industry. However, it depends on how narrowly the industry is defined – what matters is how much power the monopoly holds varying with the amount of substitutes available in the market by rival firms (Friedman, 2002). For example, a cafeteria owner has monopoly in a university, but does not have a monopoly in the entire vicinity. Like any other thing, there are two sides to monopolies – it has its advantages and disadvantages. BARRIERS TO ENTRY

The most evident property of a monopoly is the barriers to entry which are the blockages and obstacles for new firms for entering the industry. Barriers to entry include factors such as economies of scale; this is the reduction of cost per unit as the level of production increases. Since monopolies are the only firms in their respective industries, they cover the entire market demand (Grant, 2002). To supply for that, the production level is huge; which gives the firm an economies of scale unlike other new firms who produce only a small amount.

Also, the cost of production for an established firm is always lower than a new firm

Need essay sample on "Social Responsibility of Business"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page

because the new firm needs to make many expenses before it can settle down properly in the market. Another barrier to entry is product differentiation which is a clear distinction of one company’s product; it is unique and the attributes are not shared by any other product produced by any other firm. Additionally, when only one company is supplying the market demand for a long time, the customers start trusting that brand and become loyal to it in a sense that they do not switch to other firm’s products.

A new firm’s product does not have the experience in the market and does not have credibility because it is new. Moreover, the monopoly has an ownership of the majority of the key factors of production; when it is the only firm producing such a huge quantity of output, monopolies not only purchase the factors of production but also the retail and wholesale outlets. Like this, neither do the new firms have enough factors of production, nor do they have retail outlets to sell their products at.

Big monopolies are legally protected with copyrights and patents that give only their firm to practice in a particular market or area. A major barrier to entry for the firm is the threat of takeovers or mergers – the monopolies are so huge that they easily take over the small firm either by a pact or if they do not agree, by aggressive tactics (Sowell, 2004). Lastly, these big firms intimidate the small firms are heavy advertisements and price wars and by giving threats to the small new firms. Therefore, it becomes difficult for new firms to enter the market with one major monopoly operating in.

CAUSES OF HAVING MONOPOLIES Due to less money being spent in price wars, advertisements and countering the rivals since there are none; the monopolies save up a lot on cash which contributes to a rise in profits. Also, with a large output, economies of scale take place which reduces the cost of production for the firm. This can enable the firm to sell at a lower price, but monopolies do not do so. This extra profit that the monopolies earn can be used by these monopolies to invest in research and development and capital products.

Normally, firms do not invest in research and development because even after spending so much money, it kind of stays useless – reason being, that all the other firms copy the new technique and again all the firms stand at the same level and the firm that spent money on research and development eventually has no edge over the others. Thus, firms wait for rivals to invest in research and development so that they can simply copy off the techniques rather than investing so much money in it themselves. But monopolies are the sole firm and only that firm can enjoy the results concluded from the research, so they invest in it.

Also, investment in new capital goods such as assets and machinery improves the quality of work, production efficiency and the end result of the consumer good. Lastly, there is a healthy competition for corporate control; competition improves the quality of the firm (European Commission, 1997). This is not the competition in the goods market, but in the financial markets – there is always a competition for takeovers and buying of maximum shares in the firm if the firm becomes inefficient, therefore, there is a strong need for effective and proficient running of the firm. CONSEQUENCES OF MONOPOLIES

Monopolies are chiefly considered to be against public interest. In perfect competition, the price is usually set equal to the marginal cost, so that the marginal revenue is also equal to price and perfect competition is achieved at MC = MR = P. Therefore, perfect competition signifies higher output at a lower price. But for monopolies, the price is way above the marginal cost because the companies can make supernormal profit (profit above zero profit; zero profit is at MC = MR). Therefore, the public is paying a higher price than normally should be paid for; the monopolies take advantage of being the only supplier.

Especially, if the good is a necessity and the inelasticity is high, the monopolies take even more advantage of this situation (Shell, 1989). The firms are well-aware of the helplessness of the customers; they will eventually come back to buy the monopoly firm’s product because of lack of choice and the need of fulfillment of wants. This leads to an extreme unequal distribution of income; the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. The monopolies keep exploiting the customers and give no chance to the new comers so that the power in the hands of the monopoly can be neutralized.

Lastly, these monopolies also practice illegal intimidation practices to scare away the new entrants; which causes an increase in corruption along with a lack in competition (Stigler, N. D). With no competition around, the monopoly firm becomes inefficient and the productivity falls with no decrease in prices – the inefficiency is extremely harmful for the industry as it collapses as a whole since that is the only firm in the entire market. PRO-COMPETITION POLICIES The concept of competition brings in the idea of contestable markets; a market where there is no cost on entries and exits and they can be freely and easily made.

Hit and run competition, which is to enter a market for a short period of time when it is high on profits and leaving as soon as the recession starts, is also a part of contestable markets. It brings in the best of both worlds – economies of scale with a higher output with the help of monopolies and lower prices due to competition; therefore, a higher output at a lower price. When there is competition, there is a threat to the firm of their customers switching to other companies if they do not produce goods which are up to the mark.

Therefore, this keeps the firm uptight and does not let it become incompetent (Depken, 2005). Due to price wars between companies, the customers benefit because both the companies try to sell at a lower price to gain a greater customer share (Brady, 1989). Therefore, the rich and the poor to quite an extent can afford the products. Profits are also distributed evenly in the industry instead of just one firm accumulating all the profit. CONCLUSION Monopolies, being the only firm in the market, can take advantage of this pact and make huge losses or be disadvantageous due to a lack of competition leading to inefficiency.

Therefore, it is crucial to have pro-competition policies which, as a first step, reduce the barriers to entry usually set by monopolies. An ideal situation can be achieved in the industry and market if this methodology is followed.


Friedman, M. , (2002). VIII: Monopoly and the Social Responsibility of Business and LaboUR; Capitalism and Freedom; The University of Chicago Press; 40th anniversary edition; ISBN 0-226-26421-1. Depken, C. , (2005); Microeconomics Demystified, McGraw Hill; ISBN 0071459111 Brady, M. , (1989); Monopoly; Published by Bertelsmann-Club Shell, K., (1989); Economic Analysis of Production Price Indexes; Published by Cambridge University Press.

ISBN 0521556236 European Commission, Economists Advisory Group; (1997); Economies of Scale; Published by Kogan Page, Earthscan, ISBN 0749423374 Sowell, T. , (2004); Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy; Published by Basic Books, ISBN 0465081452 Grant, M. (2002), Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, Published by Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 0631231366 Stigler, G. , (Not dated), Monopoly; Library of Economics and Liberty http://www. econlib. org/library/Enc/Monopoly. html

Can’t wait to take that assignment burden offyour shoulders?

Let us know what it is and we will show you how it can be done!
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, please register

Already on Businessays? Login here

No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample register now and get a free access to all papers, carefully proofread and edited by our experts.
Sign in / Sign up
No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own
Not quite the topic you need?
We would be happy to write it
Join and witness the magic
Service Open At All Times
Complete Buyer Protection
Plagiarism-Free Writing

Emily from Businessays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy