Swot of walt disney
The Walt Disney Company has acquired Paxar Animation Studios in 2006, Marvel Entertainment in 2009 and Localism in 2012. The former 2 acquisitions have already proved to be very successful in terms of revenue and profit growth. The third acquisition is expected to be Just as successful because Disney has acquired rights to all of the Localism previous works including Star Wars. Few other Disney competitors have had such record of successful acquisitions. 4. Diversified businesses.
The business operates vie different business segments: media networks, parks and resorts, studio environment, consumer products and interactive media. These company’s segments are operated online and offline, in many different economies and are generating their income using different business models. Due to such diverse operations, Disney Localization of products. Recently, Disney has started adapting its products to suit local tastes. Besides the parks and resorts, company’s movies and consumer products are adapted for Chinese market to attract more visitors.
This is rarely initiated by the movie studio itself and is something that few other studios are doing. Weaknesses 1 . Heavy dependence on income from North America. Although, Disney operates in more than 200 countries, it heavily depends on US and Canada markets for its income.
Need essay sample on "Swot of walt disney"? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $ 13.90/page
The Walt Disney Company is the largest entertainment provider in the world and has become so due to acquisition of competitors. The last Disney’s acquisition had to be approved by Federal Trade Commission so that the company wouldn’t have to deal with antitrust problems. This means that the size of the Disney’s business has become a concern for the government due to significant market concentration and that the company has very few opportunities to acquire competitors. Otherwise, Disney may become a subject to antitrust laws.
Opportunities 1 . Growth of paid TV industries in emerging economies. The Asia Pacific region accounted for more than 50% market share of the world pay TV subscribers (394 million) in 2011. It was expected to grow to more than 55% by the end of 2016, where China would account for more than 27% of the market. The similar growth is expected in India as well. Disney Company has already entered these markets and should continue to strengthen its position there to benefit from such high industry growth. . Expansion of movie production to new countries. Disney has an opportunity to expand its movie production to such countries as India or China, where movie production industries have developed good quality infrastructure. This would result in lower movie production costs and more localized movies for India and China’s markets. Threats 1 . Intense competition. Disney operates in very competitive industries such as media, ours, parks and resorts, interactive entertainment and others.
The competitive landscape changes quite drastically in the media industry, where news and TV go online and new competitors with new business models compete more successfully than incumbent media companies. Disney’s parks and resorts business segment also receives strong competition from local competitors who can offer better-adapted product. This results in growing competitive pressure for Walt Disney Company. 2. Increasing piracy. The advancements in technology allow copying, transmitting and distributing copyrighted material much easier.
With an increasing number of internet users and the speed of internet, this poses a great risk to Disney’s income, as fewer people would go to watch movies in a cinema or buy its DVD, when it’s freely available online. 3. Strong growth of online TV and online movie renting. Besides internet piracy, Disney’s media and movie production businesses may suffer from online TV and online movie rental growth. Subscription to online TV streaming and movie rental websites costs much less than to usual cable television providers. In addition, internet infrastructure is often managed by different companies, thus